「今古独語」長享二年（一四八八）(Konko Dokugo, Chōkyō 2 (1488)
サイツコロ　　　　　トガシマサチカ
（上略）近曾長享ノ比、富樫政親謀叛ノ事モ、ソノカミ應仁一亂ノ後、加州先方衆・國人

等、寺社本所領ヲ抑へヲキシヲ、御懇勞モタシ難キニヨリ、内々御門弟ノ衆政親二申ワケ

ラレ、昔シノ如ク守護領ノ外ハ、本領ヲ諸家へ渡シ申サレシ處ヲ、又政親忠節二ヨリ、上
（マカリ）　　　　　（トナエ）
意ヲ經テ守護職一同二御下知ヲ申ウケラレ、江州鉤ノ御陣ヨリ御暇ヲ申シサレ、

事ヲ左右二ヨセテ、本願寺門弟ノ國衆ヲシリゾケ、本家領ヲヲトスヘキ企アリシユへナリ、

此義自他申ムスビ事ヤブレシカバ、同名泰高ヲ大將トシテ、カノ被官人等アヒカタラヒ、

各々諸家ノ申状ヲ立侍リヌ、初ハ越前・越中諸侍モ心ヲ合セシ輩モ、常徳院殿近江ノ國ニ

テ薨御アリシ後ハ、諸家憤リ猶々シカンニシテ、遂二六月ノ比高尾ノ城ニテハテ給ヒヌ、（下

略） (p.11-12)

This document was reportedly written by Kensei, some time after the events that it describes. It starts by stating that around the 2nd year of Chōkyō, the year of the revolt against Masachika, and following on from the Ōnin War, the `Senpō shū` of Kaga and their Kokujin allies (the allies of the shugo) had attempted to hold on to and prevent incursions into the `temple and shrine` properties of Kaga, yet they found that their hard effort could not halt the depredations. Whilst this was continuing, members of the Monto approached Masachika, stating that they would return the territory to their owners, including those lands of the shugo, thus making things as they were before. Upon reaching consensus on this decision, a message was sent to the shugo who was currently in camp in Ōmi province (involved in the suppression of the Rokkaku family), asking for a bit of his time.

After much debate, a message was relayed back to the Honganji Monto refusing their request. A plan was then created to overthrow the shugo, with each pledging himself and others to upholding this task. Togashi Yasutaka, who was acting as general at the time, spoke with his retainers, with messages then sent to each warrior household. At first the samurai of Echizen and Etchū declared their loyalty to the Togashi. After the death of the shōgun in Ōmi, each of the shōen owners of Kaga became worried, for by the six month (of Chōkyō 2) nothing could be done for Takao castle. What this document was attempting to do was explain how relations were between the Monto and the shugo before the attack on Takao castle. Obviously it has a pro-Honganji stance through its insistence that the Monto were prepared to return all lands seized by the Monto . Then it merely states that he gave up this opportunity. As the document was written sometime before the early 17th century, its accuracy can be brought into question, and would be best regarded as another form of secondary source.